Legal Opinion

People v. Hemans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By entering a plea of guilty, defendant waived his statutory speedy trial rights (People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847; People v Gee, 168 AD2d 811, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). Moreover, as a specific condition of his plea, defendant waived his right to appeal from County Court’s denial of his CPL 30.30 motion (People v Baldwin, 162 AD2d 603, lv denied 76 NY2d 937). We find no support in the record for the contention of defendant that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not understand the ramifications of his waiver.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FrisciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. GeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MelitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API