Legal Opinion

Louisiana State Bank v. Ledoux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1848PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

The defendant, Lcdoux, became the surety of James Duplessis, who was appointed note clerk of the bank, on the 26th February, 1840. The bond, by which Duplessis and his two sureties, Ledouxtmd Durrive, bound themselves jointly and severally, bears date 29 February, 1840, and is for the sum of '$12,000. It declares that: “ "Whereas James Duplessis had been appointed note clerk, to continue in office during the will of the present, or any future board of directors of said hank; now the condition of the above obligation is such, ■that if the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. The Corporation of New-Orleans v. WinterSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  3. Inhabitants of Walpole v. Inhabitants of West CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  4. Cougot v. FournierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Peurifoy, Rec'r v. LoyalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. American Bonding Co. v. Spokane Building & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  4. Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. WennerholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bank of Jeanerette v. DruilhetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API