Houck v. Overcash
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
The legal principles applicable in considering a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, G.S. 1A-1, are set forth in Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971), and approved in later cases.
In Kessing, supra at 534, 180 S.E. 2d at 830, the Court quotes with approval the following from Gordon, The New Summary Judgment Rule in North Carolina, 5 Wake Forest Intra. L. Rev. 87, 88 (1969): “The rule does not contemplate that the court will decide an issue of fact, but rather will determine whether a real issue of fact…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- In Re WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Jennings & Sons, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waff Bros. v. Bank of North Carolina, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Freeman v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Walker Manufacturing Co. v. Dickerson, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1980
- Brantley v. MeekinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.