Legal Opinion

Beers v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Trial Term, Kings County. Action by Sarah F. Beers against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a verdict of the jury, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff alighted from a north-bound street car in Fourth avenue in the city of New York, and waited on the cross-walk until it had started north on the easterly track and cleared the way for her to cross Fourth avenue westward. She was struck by a south-bound car on the westerly track, and thrown back upon the north-bound track, sustaining severe injuries. The plaintiff testified that, as the *786car on which she had been a passenger…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zwack v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Smith v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Sesselmann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Turell v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Towner v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pomerantz v. Bryan Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Vandeskie v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API