Bronisz v. Cienkowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 107, Oct. T., 1917, by defendants, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T.,'1916, No. 1468, for plaintiff n. o. v. in case of Ludwik J. Bronisz v. Stanislaus J. Cienkowski, Landlord, and John J. Brady, Constable. Replevin for goods distrained. Before Finletter, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff n. o. v.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Williams, J.,
Plaintiff brought replevin to recover goods distrained for rent.
In February, 1914, defendant, Cienkowski, leased certain premises to one Kupiec for two years. April 10, 1915, the lease was assigned Avith his Avritten permission to plaintiff. December 8, 1915, he notified plaintiff to quit. February 10,1916, he notified plaintiff that he had forfeited the leasehold by violating a covenant against subletting. Plaintiff did not remove and February 17th, Cienkowski entered judgment in an amicable action of ejectment. February 23d, plaintiff filed a petition to open the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Steele v. MaherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909