Glass v. Glass
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lester Holtzmak", J.
In an action for an accounting, the plaintiff in two concurrent motions seeks (1) to modify the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars by striking all the items therein except items 2,10, 17 and 19 and (2) for summary judgment. The defendant cross-moves to dismiss the first, second and third causes of action in the complaint for legal insufficiency.
The plaintiff’s first motion seeking to modify the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars is granted. All the items therein, excepting items 2, 10, 17 and 19, are to be stricken. This is an action for an accounting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Estate of JuedelNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Belfanc v. BelfancAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Belfanc v. BelfancNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rush v. RushNew York Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.