Reynolds v. North Side Canal Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.
This is a mandamm proceeding. The material allegations of fact contained in petitioner’s affidavit-are as follows: That petitioner acquired the legal title to certain lands in Jerome county, embodied in a Carey Act segregation; that the contract for the construction of an irrigation system was entered into between the state of Idaho and the Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Company; that the Carey Act company entered into a contract with L. M. Nelson, petitioner’s predecessor, whereby it sold a water right to Nelson, evidenced by one share of the capital stock of the North Side Canal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crow v. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Adams v. Twin Falls-Oakley Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Shelby v. Farmers' Co-operative Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Parrott v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- McHale v. Goshen Ditch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Sears v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Rogers v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Mower v. BondDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1925