Mills v. State of Maine
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON A STIPULATED RECORD
HORNBY, District Judge.
In the liability portion of this dispute, I ruled that the State may treat its probation officers as employees working in a law enforcement capacity under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (the “FLSA”). Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Dec. 21, 1993) 839 F.Supp. 3. The parties have now filed cross-motions on a stipulated record on four issues affecting what damages the State must pay the probation officers. I address them in turn.
Applicability op the Law Enforcement Exception
The first issue is whether the State…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joanie Dybach v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Victor Lopez v. Corporacion Azucarera De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria Mireles, Cross-Appellees v. Frio Foods, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Mills v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Andrews v. DuBoisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Bolduc v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Chessin v. Keystone Resort Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.