Legal Opinion

State v. Hirschman

Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided July 7, 2016No. MI121020; A153610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

Acting as a self-described “Internet troll,” defendant posted an advertisement on Craigslist, stating that he would give $20 to a person who would bring the person’s official ballot to defendant, let defendant complete it, then sign the person’s own name and submit the ballot to an elections volunteer. It is undisputed that defendant did not intend to actually vote using another person’s ballot. To the contrary, the state acknowledged that defendant’s motives were “political shenanigans * * * on the Internet” and “entertainment.” Nonetheless, the state charged defendant with knowingly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. GardinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API