Legal Opinion

United States v. Reyes-Batista

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 9, 2021No. 19-4052-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-4052-cr United States v. Reyes-Batista UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API