Legal Opinion

Root, Neilson & Co. v. Bryant

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion in the Supreme Court for an order to stay proceedings. pending the appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, by the Court (from the Bench):

The plaintiffs brought this action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien upon certain saw-mill property, and impleaded the London and San Francisco Bank as a party holding a - subordinate lien upon the same property. The action was tried, and a decree entered, by which it was "ordered that the property be sold, and *184that. Root, Reilson & Co. be first paid their claim in full out of the proceeds of the sale, and that the claim of the London and San Francisco Bank be paid out of the surplus, if any remained. The bank moved for a new trial, which was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keeling Collection Agency v. McKeeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McMillan v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sheffer v. GriffithsUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Beshara v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API