In Re Workman's Estate
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentKelly, J.
Upon six points, the writer is unable to concur in the opinion of the court.
That the appeal of Carruthers from the order denying and overruling his petition to be appointed executor did not operate to stay the proceedings. The writer is of the opinion that it did.
That a special administrator could not have been appointed pending appeal.
That pending said appeal, any duty rested upon Callan other than to conserve the corpus of the estate.
That the order was valid approving the purported final account of Callan and declaring the estate fully administered when made upon the same day that this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Spring v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Livesley v. Krebs Hop Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Helms Groover & Dubber Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bestel v. BestelOregon Supreme Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.