Legal Opinion
Kaye Associates v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 1, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-2988(JFG)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge:
BACKGROUND
On February 23, 1990, plaintiff, Kaye Associates (“Kaye”), filed a Complaint against defendant, Board of Chosen Freeholders-Gloucester County (“Gloucester County”), in the Superior Court of Camden County, New Jersey. The Complaint alleged that Gloucester County breached a contract to pay Kaye for consulting services in connection with the installation of a telecommunications system.
Thereafter, having obtained leave of court, Gloucester County filed a two count third-party complaint against Honeywell Inc. (“Honeywell”). The first count alleges that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Libhart v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Federal Insurance Company v. TYCO INTERNATIONALDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Moore v. DeBiaseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Monmouth-Ocean Collection Service, Inc. v. KlorDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Palmer v. University of Medicine and DentistryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Starr v. Prairie Harbor Development Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.