Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Sheldon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 2010No. 2D09-1347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

William Bishop, a committed person under the Involuntary Civil Commitment of *260Sexually Violent Predators Act1 (the Act), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking his immediate release from the Florida Civil Commitment Center. He asserts that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the commitment petition filed under the Act because he was not in lawful custody at the time that proceedings under the Act were commenced. We conclude that factual issues preclude us from determining whether Bishop was in lawful custody when the State commenced…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Tripp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  4. Murray v. RegierSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Morel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Bishop v. SheldonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. In Re Commitment of PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Insko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API