Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 24, 2002No. SC01-1775PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

831 So.2d 172 (2002)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Daniel C. ATKINSON, Respondent.

No. SC01-1775.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 24, 2002.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Dyann W. Beaty, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Howard L. Dimmig II, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal on the following question, which the court certified to be of great public importance:

DO…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. City of St. Petersburg v. SieboldSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. FL. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. Contractpoint Florida Parks, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. School Board of Palm Beach County v. Survivors Charter Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2009
  5. Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API