Legal Opinion

Second Nat. B'k of Oswego v. . Poucher

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The testimony upon the qestion whether the plaintiff discharged Herrick, one of the makers, from liability upon the note, was conflicting. The correctness of the finding by the trial judge, that it did not, cannot be examined by this court.

The judge found that on the day the note fell due, one of the makers, Merriman, intended to pay it and drew the check of the firm of Merriman Herrick (the makers), for the amount of the note on the National Marine Bank, and went to the bank where the note was made payable, met the president, Mr. Ames, at or near the door of the bank, showed him the check…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. . SicklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Bonner v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Foster v. GastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tiffany v. WillisNew York Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API