Legal Opinion
Carman v. Yolo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 23, 2008No. CIV. S-06-1374 FCD KJMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Raymond Carman (“Carman” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against defendant Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the “District”), claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) (29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.). Specifically, plaintiff seeks damages, in the form of allegedly unpaid minimum wages and overtime wages, for his work as a damtender at the Cache Creek Dam. Plaintiff also seeks equitable remedies and unpaid benefits based upon the allegedly uncompensated work hours, which would have…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mendiola v. CPS Security SolutionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013