Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Henry Glantz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 16, 1988No. 87-1121PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Glantz appeals his conviction of peijury and conspiracy to obstruct justice in connection with testimony before a federal grand jury. He argues that the district court failed to recognize that one of his false statements before the grand jury was “literally true” and thus not perjurious as a matter of law. He also claims the district court committed reversible error by giving faulty jury instructions. We disagree and affirm the convictions.
I
When the convoluted business dealings that ultimately led to this prosecution began, Mr. Glantz was a part owner of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Kenneth Robert Glenn, United States of America v. Manuel J. BenevidesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Alejo Maldonado MedinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Leo Vitello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alfreda BarnesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Robert KiszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Thomas J. Lanigan v. Michael T. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.