Legal Opinion

Bell v. Department of Health & Human Resources

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-CA-0576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge.

Four civil servants appeal the Commission’s partial dismissal of their appeal of the Director’s reallocation of their job to positions of lower pay. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were informed by letter from the Director of the Department of Civil *237Service on December 23, 1982, that their positions had been reallocated from Equipment Operator I to Laborer-Utility. Plaintiffs appealed this reallocation to the Director pursuant to Civil Service Rule 5.3 and to the Civil Service Commission pursuant to Rule 13.10. The Director affirmed the reallocation, but after plaintiffs’ objection that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. La. Health & Human Resources Adm'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Shelton v. Southeastern Louisiana UniversityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Perkins v. Director of PersonnelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Smith v. DIVISION OF ADMIN., ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Matter of Marine Shale Processors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Easley v. Department of State Civil ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Bell v. Department of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API