Legal Opinion

Estate of Komarr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1975No. 424PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented on appeal:

1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in admitting testimony over objections as to the competency of the witness and the hearsay rule?

2. Is the 1920 adoption proceeding void by virtue of jurisdictional defects and fraud practiced on the court?

Admission of evidence.

Kathleen Buban testified that she is the niece of Evelyn Komarr and that Evelyn’s only child, to her knowledge, is George Vargo. No parents, brothers or sisters of the deceased were living at the time of her death. Steve Vargo and herself are the only surviving children of the deceased’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tennessen v. TopelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zrimsek v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wolf v. FoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bresnehan v. BresnehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hull v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gerczak v. Estate of GerczakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. Marriage of Seng Xiong v. VangCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API