Shaw v. Parvin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Collin County.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
White, P. J.
§ 365. Contemporaneous instruments. Two or more instruments, executed contemporaneously between the same parties, in reference to the same subject matter, are deemed one instrument and one contract. [Dunlap v. Wright, 11 Tex. 597; Howard v. Davis, 6 Tex. 174; Alexander v. Baylor, 20 Tex. 560.]
§ 366. Parol evidence in connection with ivritien instruments. In general, parol evidence is not admissible to vary a written contract [Dewees v. Lockhart, 1 Tex. 535; Franklin v. Mooney, 2 Tex. 452; Stamper v. Johnson, 3 Tex. 1; Self v. King, 28 Tex. 552]; but such evidence is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dunlap's Adm'r v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Howards v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Self v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Stampers v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Roberts v. ShortTexas Supreme Court · 1846
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.