Legal Opinion
Fogg v. Randolph
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
Two motions are considered herein. The Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters (Brotherhood) and The New York Central System (Central), defendants, 1 each move under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for dismissal of the complaint.
The plaintiffs allege that they are sleeping car porters (Porters) and sleeping-lounge car attendants (Attendants) employed by Central who bring the action individually and in behalf of other porters and attendants similarly situated. Jurisdiction is alleged under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 ff., and under section 102…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cleveland Orchestra Committee v. Cleveland Federation of Musicians, Local No. 4, American Federation of Musicians, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abrams v. Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Thompson v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Hill v. Aro CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
- Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Bruen v. Local 492, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine WorkersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.