Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Southerland

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided September 26, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for the Central District of the Indian Territory; before Justice T. C. Humphry, March 11, 1905.. Action by D. A. Taylor against J. T. Southerland, in which R. Moffett & Sons and J. H. Randall, intervened as co-defendants. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

Appellant brought his action in the commissioner’s court against appellee, Southerland, to recover $125 for rent of land. In that court R. Moffett & Sons and J. H. Randall, guardian of Elizabeth and Robert Randall, *668were let in as codefendants. Judgment was rendered in that ■court against appellant. He appealed to the District Court, with the same result. He is now in this court, complaining of [numerous errors committed by the last-named court, prejudicial to his legal rights.

He assigns 11 errors, the first of which is the overruling ■of his demurrer to defendants’ first amended answer, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winn v. MureheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Grabow v. McCracken Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. First Nat. Bank of Sayre v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API