Legal Opinion

United States v. James Newsome and Mattie Ruth Bowens

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1970No. 51PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:

Appellants James Newsome and Mattie Ruth Bowens, having waived jury trial, were tried by the court and convicted of possessing and transporting nontaxpaid whiskey, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205(a) (2) and 5604(a). We affirm. Appellants’ contentions are twofold: (1) The warrantless arrest was without probable cause, and the whiskey seized as a result of the consequent alleged illegal search of their vehicle should have been suppressed; (2) the trial court erred in refusing to require disclosure of the identity of a messenger who notified Treasury Agent Durham that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Elmer Samuel Chapman, United States of America v. James Terrell KnightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. James Newsome and Mattie Ruth BowensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API