Bassett v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The question raised on this appeal is whether appellees, who undertook improvement of their property by hiring private contractors and sold the property within 24 months of completion, are speculative builders under the City of Tucson Business Privilege Tax Ordinance, §§ 19-39.1(2), (3), (6), and (7), and therefore subject to the city’s two percent business privilege tax under the contracting classification. We hold that they are under the plain language of the ordinance.
On cross-motions for summary judgment submitted on the pleadings, exhibits and memoranda of counsel,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Pace v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State Tax Commission v. Ranchers Exploration & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tony P. Sellitti Construction Co. v. CarylWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- City of Phoenix v. Santa Anita Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- SDC Management, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- RDB Thomas Road Partnership v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994