Legal Opinion

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during summation has not been preserved for our review because he failed to object to the prosecutor’s comments (see, People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, 324; People v Price, 144 AD2d 1013, Iv denied 73 NY2d 895). Moreover, the claimed improprieties were either within the wide rhetorical bounds granted to the prosecutor to comment upon the evidence or made in response to defense counsel’s summation (People v Price, supra, at 1013; see, People v Tardbania, 130 AD2d 954,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. TardbaniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API