Legal Opinion

People v. Tardbania

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1988PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye,…

2Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. D'AlessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API