Legal Opinion
Hipsch v. Hipsch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaRtin, J.
It is stated in the trial court’s opinion :
“It seems clear that testator intended to devise and bequeath to his wife only a part of his estate and the residue, upon termination of the trust, to go to his brother, two sisters, and his wife. We cannot hold that he intended all of his property to go to his widow which would be the result under the statutes (237.02) (318.01) had he not lawfully devised or bequeathed the same.”
Sec. 237.02, Stats., provides:
“Homestead how to descend. When the owner of any homestead shall die, not having lawfully devised the same, such homestead shall descend in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bresnehan v. BresnehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Guerin v. UphoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Gibbs v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Williams v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Jankewicz v. DmitrovskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966