Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moyer v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1966No. 44,442Published

1DissentSchroeder, J.

For the several reasons hereafter assigned, I must respectfully dissent.

It should first be noted the factual situation here presented is not the ordinary case where a landowner objects to the rezoning of a tract of land. This matter grows out of the new 1-35 bypass highway which completely semicircles Emporia, Kansas, on the north. This bypass has only three interchanges for the city of Emporia. Interchange No. 1 is on the west of Emporia at Industrial Road. At this point there is considerable industrial development. Interchange No. 2 is with Highway No. 99 to the north of the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Barclay v. MitchumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Gehring v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Poretsky v. WolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Noll Ex Rel. Noll v. SchneblySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API