Legal Opinion

Chesson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 17, 1999No. 98-2062PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant appeals the denial of his motion made pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800 to vacate his twenty year sentence entered pursuant to a plea agreement on the grounds that it is illegal. For purposes of rule 3.800, an illegal sentence is one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard to the guidelines. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla.1995); Wright v. State, 711 So.2d 66, 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Hinson v. State, 709 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); State v. Moten, 698 So.2d 1345, 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Skidmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. State v. MotenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Hinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BARTON HILL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  2. Thacker v. SingletaryDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API