Legal Opinion

Orcutt v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 14, 1969No. 53042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

The trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant in an action for debt on open account and defendant appeals, contending his timely resistance to the motion duly apprised the court of the existence of a substantial issue of fact which might well determine the rights • of the parties to the action. We agree and remand the cause for a trial on the issue of whether there was a settlement or novation at the time defendant executed and delivered a note covering the amount of the open account.

In his action at law plaintiff Lyle E. Or-cutt sought to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eaton v. DowneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Bjornsen Construction Co. v. J. A. Whitmer & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Credit Industrial Company v. Happel, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Petit v. Ervin Clark Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. American State Bank v. LeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Bank of Sioux City v. SteinbeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Byker v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
  4. Farmers National Bank of Winfield v. Winfield Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Willow Tree Investments, Inc. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API