Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Harshbarger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2017No. 17–16–21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P.J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Paul Deitz ("Paul"), in his individual capacity and as the personal representative of the estate of Christina Deitz ("Christina"), and Alexis Deitz ("Alexis") (collectively "plaintiffs"), appeal the July 24, 2015 decision of the Shelby County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellant, the Franklin Township Board of Board of Trustees of Shelby County, Ohio (the "Board of Trustees"). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} This case stems from a negligence and wrongful death complaint filed by plaintiffs on June 26, 2014…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. White v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emmerling v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County2017
  2. Stykes v. Colerain Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Buchenroth v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Williams v. Shawnee Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API