Bielen v. Bielen
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering him to pay an award of postjudgment attorney’s fees and expenses. The defendant raises five claims of error, all of which we have fully considered and reject as without merit.
Four of the defendant’s five claims concern either the factfinding or the discretionary function of the trial court. The defendant has failed to demonstrate that the facts found are clearly erroneous, or that the court abused its discretion.
The only claim of the defendant which warrants discussion is that the court erred by granting the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caracansi v. CaracansiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Carter v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Fisher v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Cuneo v. CuneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Tufano v. TufanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989