Legal Opinion

State v. Lott

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1936No. 4101PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

The original opinion is withdrawn and this substituted.

The appellants were convicted of the theft of one neat cattle and sentenced to be imprisoned for a term in the state penitentiary. The grounds advanced for reversal are that neither venue nor appellants’ connection with the theft was proved.

The evidence and inferences tending to prove venue and theft, are as follows: L. O. Morgan was the owner of approximately 100 head of cattle, among which was a red-polled heifer about 16 months old, branded 1BIF on the left shoulder and side. He moved 14 head of these cattle, including…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State v. KinseyUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. May v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Dickey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API