Richter v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Cullman Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. D. W. Speake. A1 Bidder was convicted of selling spirtuous, vinous or malt liquors without a license and contrary to law, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
The appellant in this case was convicted of the offense of selling spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors contrary to law in Cullman county. It is admitted that the liquor was sold, and that the probate judge had issued a license to the defendant.
The first contention of the appellant is that the law was not complied with in the calling of the special term of the court at which he was tried. The statute requires 30 days’ notice of such special terms, etc., by advertisement in a newspaper, etc. Code 1896, § 915. It is admitted that the newspaper containing the notice was issued on January 4, 1908,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bluett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- State ex rel. Meyer v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Linnehan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. Town of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Ex Parte RegisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Johnson v. SalterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- McLaughlin v. HardwickAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.