Legal Opinion

Ames v. Randle

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 18, 2013No. 11 C 920PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Thomas R. Ames brings this action under. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) against Michael P. Randle, Terry McCann, Anthony Ramos, Frank Shaw, Marvin Reed,, Anna Dockery and John Doe (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. (R. 34, Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1-2.) Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (R. 52, Defs.’ Mot.) For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

RELEVANT…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Davis v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Augusta v. People of the State of IllinoisDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. Barkes v. Wexford Health SourcesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Beard v. FinkDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Curry v. ObaisiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API