Legal Opinion

Craddock v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1917No. 6010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; S. G. Tayloe, Judge. Injunction by Frank Craddock, Jr., against the City of San Antonio. From interlocutory judgment denying the writ, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment denying an injunction sought to restrain the enforcement of a certain traffic ordinance enacted by the city of San Antonio. Appellant describes himself as being “engaged in the business of operating automobiles for hire, known as special car service” in the city of San Antonio, under an ordinance dated March 8, 1915; alleges that he had paid his license fee of $25, required by the ordinance, from June 1, 1917, to and including May 31, 1918; that on August 27, 1917, the board of commissioners of San Antonio had passed an ordinance or amendment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Le Blanc v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Morris & Cummings v. State ex rel. GussettTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. City of Memphis v. State ex rel. RyalsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Auto Transit Co. v. City of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. City of New Orleans v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ex Parte ParrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Schafer v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Northern Texas Utilities Co. v. Community Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. City of Waco v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API