Canary v. Canary
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
This was an action to modify a judgment for permanent alimony. Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as the husband and defendant in error as the wife.
While a divorce action, brought by the wife, was pending, the parties, by contract, settled their property rights. That contract was incorporated in the final decree and its terms became the judgment of the court. Alleging changed conditions, which made enforcement of this decree inequitable and impossible, the husband filed his “Application for Modification.’ ’ To review the judgment denying that application he brings error, asks that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Lewis v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Prewitt v. PrewittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Jewel v. JewelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lay v. LaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Barraclough v. BarracloughUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Duvall v. DuvallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.