Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Perez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1968No. 41277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding refusing appellant bail after indictment for murder with malice of his wife.

The Constitution of this State provides that all prisoners are entitled to bail except in capital cases, when the “proof is evident.” Art. I, Section 11.

“The term ‘proof is evident’ means the accused, with cool and deliberate mind and formed design, maliciously killed the deceased, and that upon a hearing of the facts before the court a dispassionate jury would, upon such evidence, not only convict but would assess the death penalty.” Ex…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThrashCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Ex Parte PaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Ex Parte WashburnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Ex parte ShultsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Ex Parte CollinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ContellaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Ex Parte SierraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Taglianetti v. FontaineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Ex Parte ContellaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API