Ex Parte Contella
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
These are appeals from orders in habeas corpus proceedings refusing bail to appellants after indictment for murder with malice.
Art. I, Section 11 of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., provides, in part: “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses, when the proof is evident. . . . ” Art. 1.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., likewise provides, in part: “All prisoners shall be bailable unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident.” A capital felony is defined in Art. 47, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. as “An offense for which the highest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Ex Parte PaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- Ex Parte SawyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Reino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- United States v. James A. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Ex Parte BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.