Goldstein v. State

HAEPEE, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted, of receiving and concealing stolen property.

A number of hills of exception are presented in the record in regard to the introduction of testimony, hut as qualified and approved by the court none of them present error. However, the appellant submitted a special charge requesting the court to submit to the jury the question of whether or not the witness, Frank Barrett, was an accomplice within the meaning of our statutes governing accomplice testimony. Claude Eice is the self-confessed thief. He was staying with Barrett. He says Barrett knew…