Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Siegler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2009No. COA07-1420PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendants Lear Siegler and American Motorist Insurance appeal the opinion and award of the Full Commission concluding that plaintiff James M. Erickson’s cervical spine condition was a compensable injury. Defendants have not disputed that plaintiff suffered a compensable back injury, but contend that any workers’ compensation benefits should be limited to disability and medical expenses arising out of plaintiff’s lower back condition rather than his cervical spine condition. We find unpersuasive defendants’ contention that the. Commission’s jurisdiction was timely invoked only as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. A.C. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Cunningham v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. Cunningham v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. Mahone v. Home Fix Custom RemodelingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Mahone v. Home Fix Custom RemodelingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API