Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Decatur Cotton Seed Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1917No. 8515PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This is the second appeal of this case. On the first appeal the judgment of the trial court was reversed and the cause remanded, as shown in 179 S. W. 1104. The statement of the pleadings there given we adopt' for this appeal, except that on the second trial the defendant admitted in writing that plaintiff’s cattle were not struck at a public crossing, or at any crossing, on defendant’s right of way. The cause was submitted to a jury on special issues, and in answer thereto the jury found as follows:(1) That the reasonable market value of the cattle killed was $319.(2) That the cattle in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Jackson & EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Scalf v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. GallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Dallas Ry. Co. v. HallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Degenhardt v. JoplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rhoades v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API