Legal Opinion

State v. Adcock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1983No. 121A83Published

1Opinion of the Court

310 S.E.2d 587 (1984)

310 N.C. 1

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Billy Raye ADCOCK.

No. 121A83.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 1983.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Donald W. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Robert W. Wyrick, Jerry B. Clayton and Susan F. Olive, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to quash the indictment charging him with murder and to quash the petit jury panel. He contends that the grand and petit jurors were selected in a discriminatory manner and did not represent a cross…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API