Legal Opinion

Leypoldt & Pennington Co. v. Davis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1924No. 22824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

This action is brought by the plaintiff against the director general of railroads, as agent for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company, to recover the value of certain potatoes alleged to have been frozen during their transportation from Mitchell to North Platte, Nebraska. They were shipped from Mitchell and carried as far as Northport over the Burlington line and from Northport to North Platte over the Union Pacific. Plaintiff seeks to recover on two theories : First, the negligence of the defendants in furnishing defective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. N. H. Nelson & Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. A. Gauthier & Son v. HinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. W. H. Blodget Co. v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Dye Produce Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Close v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Frank Edgar Co. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API