Legal Opinion

Frank Edgar Co. v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 3, 1946Published

1Opinion of the CourtEno, J.

This is an action by the consignee of a shipment of flower plants, to recover damages arising from its injury by freezing while in transit between Urbana, Ohio, and Waltham, in this Commonwealth.

This action is described in the writ as an action of “contract and tort.”

The plaintiff’s declaration is as follows:

“Now comes the Plaintiff and for its declaration, says that on or about December 29,1943, he purchased from Louis Dank of Urbana, Ohio, One Thousand.Five Hundred (1500) Nephthytis Liberica plants; that on or about January 1, 1944, he entered into a contract of carriage with the Defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DettlebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Western Transit Co. v. A. C. Leslie & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Gott v. DinsmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Fox v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API