Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael R. Griess

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1992No. 91-1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In sentencing Michael R. Griess, the district court departed upward from the guidelines-specified sentence. Griess appeals, claiming that the departure was improper. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In October 1989, Griess was charged with one count of making a false declaration while testifying before a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a), three counts of distributing marijuana, each in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and one count of distributing cocaine, also in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. In March 1990, Griess was convicted on all counts.

Griess’s presentence investigation report (PSI)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Michael E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Larry DortchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Joseph E. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jimmie L. WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin JoshuaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Michael White BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States v. Dustin MerrivalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. FloresDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API