United States v. Michael R. Griess
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
In sentencing Michael R. Griess, the district court departed upward from the guidelines-specified sentence. Griess appeals, claiming that the departure was improper. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In October 1989, Griess was charged with one count of making a false declaration while testifying before a grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a), three counts of distributing marijuana, each in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and one count of distributing cocaine, also in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. In March 1990, Griess was convicted on all counts.
Griess’s presentence investigation report (PSI)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Michael E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry DortchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph E. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jimmie L. WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Martin JoshuaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michael White BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Dustin MerrivalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FloresDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.