Legal Opinion

State v. Hull

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 2014No. COA14-251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where there was evidence of all of the elements of the charge of larceny from the person, the trial court did not err in denying defendants’ motions to dismiss. The trial court did not commit plain error in its jury instructions on that charge. Where defendant was sentenced from the presumptive range, the trial court did not err by failing to make findings in mitigation or aggravation, or in not sentencing defendant from the mitigated range. Where the State presented evidence that Stuart’s computer was in proximity to her and under her control, the trial court did not err in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. MillsapsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. SimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API