Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldsmith v. Clinton

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 29, 1998No. Misc. No. 97-8012; Crim.App. Misc. No. 96-14Published

1Dissent

GIERKE, Judge, with whom CRAWFORD, Judge, joins

(dissenting):

In my view 10 USC § 1167 pertains to a collateral administrative consequence of Major Goldsmith’s sentence that may or may not occur. This Court has no jurisdiction over administrative personnel actions.

Unlike Articles 57 and 58, UCMJ, 10 USC §§ 857 and 858, respectively, at issue in United States v. Gorski, 47 MJ 370 (1997), § 1167 is not part of the Uniform Code of Military Justice but, instead, is part of the United States Code pertaining to personnel matters. Also unlike Articles 57 and 58, which make forfeitures and reduction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. Pickell v. ReedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
  3. Helmich v. NibertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API