Legal Opinion
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-3656-OGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge. *
This case is before the court following a bench trial held June 25 and 26, 1990. This court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 145 and § 306 (1988). The plaintiff, Joy Technologies, Inc. (Joy), brought this action against the defendant, the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Commissioner), 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 145 (1988) challenging the reexamination decision of the Patent and Trademark Office, which held claims 1 to 4, 11, 12, 16, and 18 of Joy’s U.S. Patent No. 4,042,864 (the ’864 patent) unpatentable under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Dome Patent, L.P. v. ReaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Teles Ag v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013